Saturday, January 30, 2010

A Treatise on Trust

Since I have had an emotionally draining day and have no mood to study, I though I will do an introspection on TRUST. All the things written are my own thoughts, at the moment, from a frayed mind. They maybe strikingly accurate or woefully wrong. Correct me if I am wrong.

Trust by nature is very fickle. It cannot be relied upon, for the simple reason that every person's idea of trust varies. What I may consider an act of trust someone else may an act of selfishness. Acts that would otherwise have bridged gaps and strengthened trust can just as quickly be the undoing of a relationship.

A person can be thought of as a garden with a lot of beautiful flowers, thorns and touch-me-not plants, and a small lawn. The lawn is a person's comfort zone. It is nice to sit on and very co-operative and smiling during a conversation. Anything that you want to know about the person is here for all to see. This is the part a person likes to portray. Usually a very sunny picture with beautiful flowers at the edges. Flowers to only look pretty.

The flower garden is where you go once you are pretty close to that person. We get to go into the flower gardens of very few people in our lives, invariably because they are very well guarded. It is in this flower garden that you know the real character of a person. Whether his plants are rotten or whether there is a beautiful lotus in the murky pond. Trusting a person is going into this flower garden with the full knowledge of the owner and being able to pluck flowers without causing the person any pain. Most people flinch when their flowers are plucked because a plucking causes the same amount of pain, whether it is torn by a band of marauding Mongols or picked up by a beautiful young maiden to give to her loved one. The first plucking is probably the most important in terms of establishing trust.

Even when the first plucking is done, it does not guarantee easy access to everything in the garden. There are fickle things like the touch-me-not plants. They cringe at the slightest touch and invariably stay cringed until you vacate the premises. These are the sensitive parts of the person's mind that will not suffer your touch, however pleasurable or coaxing it is. It is actually the amount of touch-me-not s present in the garden that determines whether a person is an extrovert or an introvert. Try too much touching, or walk like an oaf and you're out of the garden before you know it. It is a very painful and difficult procedure to get back to the garden. Even if you make it back there, you will find most of it barred.

Tread very carefully where the touch-me-not s lie. They may be hidden to the eye or in plain sight. A person who willfully touches them and enjoys seeing them cringe is a friend to none. A person who touches one by mistake, causes cringing but can be forgiven. A humble request to all readers. Please differentiate between those that have touched your touch-me-not s willfully and those that have done so by mistake. Every touch hurts, but some you can bear. Pushing every person who touches them out of your garden will only make sure you have no more visitors.

Think how all of you act in others' gardens and then think of how they are treating you, whether you deserve it or not.

Gods be with you.

6 comments:

  1. Nice. I plannd 2 rite on trust too!!, but u took that topic away from me!! I cud prolly say that trust is the one thing that drives all to socialize. To trust another is an ultimate act of sealing ur frendship. Unless u truly trust another, u cant term him(er) as "close" to you. Or as a friend. Trust is the ultimate bond, and what all humans crave from one another. Think bout it and u shall kno it 2 b true.


    But dont u think that u and I bcame just a bit too philosopical here? Hey, u started it :P. Nvm. Just kidding.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Philosophical?? I guess I am Philosophical and with good reason... and a muhahaha to you on stealing the idea... you should have been quicker :P

    ReplyDelete
  3. Being philosophical is excellent. Being too philosophical is unhealthy and time consuming. Well, it is true that currently, there is no dearth of time bcoz of the "study" holidays imposed on us. So write on ;).

    ReplyDelete
  4. trust is abstract...we know it!...a very old topic but i believe that we still live happily on this planet or in a wider sense the universe basically trusting it...i mean wat if the earth plans to change its course by just one metre?..we'llall b dead...but we trust it..s we dont think abt it!...this gives a clear cut example or a model to show that to survive...we need to trust!..inclding the molecules that have made up ur ceiling..:P...everything for that matter...wat if i dont trust someone??..unhappiness starts...

    another situation here..i need u ppl to comment on..
    wat according to u all is the "trustworthy"ness?
    and who do u consider trustworthy?.i mean.hwdya judje 'em?

    ReplyDelete
  5. WEll.. trusting a person is basically walking on the edge of a precipice at midnight. And trustworthiness is someone holding your hand and guiding you. Whenever you are at the edge, its very easy easy to be pushed down.
    A pessimist always expects to be pushed down. An optimist always hopes to be saved.

    A realist on the other hand gropes for the other's hand always holding onto the railing. Its always better to be a realist. Not so easy to be pushed down.

    But i guess it takes a fall to learn that lesson. :) Once bitten twice shy...

    ans suku.. there is absolutely no way on earth you can judge someone's trustworthiness. If you're smart you will not trust someone that deeply. Ultimately everyone is selfish, atleast when saving their skin is concerned. If you have a friend who is ready to die for you then you are one lucky guy. :)

    ReplyDelete